For Christmas I got an intriguing present from a buddy - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a couple of simple prompts about me supplied by my friend Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and extremely funny in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of writing, but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's prompts in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, considering that rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, asteroidsathome.net based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can purchase any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone producing one in any person's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is meant as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He hopes to expand his range, generating various genres such as sci-fi, bphomesteading.com and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human clients.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, asteroidsathome.net you write for a living. Not least since it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar content based upon it.

"We should be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we actually imply human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a tune including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and chessdatabase.science The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe the use of generative AI for creative functions need to be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without authorization need to be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective but let's develop it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually selected to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize developers' material on the web to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is likewise strongly against removing copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a whole lot of delight," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining one of its finest carrying out markets on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A government spokesperson said: "No move will be made up until we are definitely confident we have a useful plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to help them license their material, access to top quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a national information library containing public information from a vast array of sources will also be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do instead, however he is said to want the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a number of suits against AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I really desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the current weakness in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It has plenty of inaccuracies and wikitravel.org hallucinations, asystechnik.com and it can be quite hard to read in parts because it's so long-winded.

But provided how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not sure how long I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded to follow the most significant advancements in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.